Carlo H. Francisco
Member
Good day guys,
Just want to ask, if there is a similar code here like (TRY, CATCH) in vb.net?
Just want to ask, if there is a similar code here like (TRY, CATCH) in vb.net?
Question Try Catch
- Thread starter Carlo H. Francisco
- Start date
RealHeavyDude
Well-Known Member
AFAIK the structured error handling was introduced somewere around OpenEdge 10.1. I did use OpenEdge 10.1c and that version did support it.
there's a try/catch/finally in the progress standard libraries at the oehive.org that's compatible with version 9 or higher.
the progress try catch is pretty rigid anyways.
hth
the progress try catch is pretty rigid anyways.
Code:
{slib/sliberr.i}
define var cError as char no-undo.
define var cErrorMsg as char no-undo.
{slib/err_try}:
run something {slib/err_no-error}. /* you can also use {slib/err_throw "'<exception name>'" [params]}. */
/* you can use nested try blocks for as many levels as you'd like */
{slib/err_catch cError cErrorMsg}: /* catch is optional */
message cErrorMsg.
/* you can use {slib/err_throw last}. to retrhow the catched error */
{slib/err_finally}: /* finally is optional */
message "finally".
{slib/err_end}.
message "after",hth
Last edited:
Carlo H. Francisco
Member
Sir joey,
That sli/sliberr is that a default or already made inside the progress?
I am using 10.2b.
That sli/sliberr is that a default or already made inside the progress?
I am using 10.2b.
As joey wrote, those includes are from oehive.org.
With 10.2b you could use the built-in throw/catch/finally features. Some things to keep in mind:
- Mixing the old (on error ...) and new error handling can yield strange or unexplainable results.
- You can use
routine-level on error undo, throw.
or
block-level on error undo, throw.
at the beginning of a program file if you want the new error handling to apply without writing it every time.
- catch doesn't catch stop conditions. You will still need "on stop ..." somewhere.
- catch suppresses the output of error messages as opposed to "on error", unless you re-throw the exception. It might be necessary to display the caught exceptions manually, otherwise looking for an error may get very difficult.
With 10.2b you could use the built-in throw/catch/finally features. Some things to keep in mind:
- Mixing the old (on error ...) and new error handling can yield strange or unexplainable results.
- You can use
routine-level on error undo, throw.
or
block-level on error undo, throw.
at the beginning of a program file if you want the new error handling to apply without writing it every time.
- catch doesn't catch stop conditions. You will still need "on stop ..." somewhere.
- catch suppresses the output of error messages as opposed to "on error", unless you re-throw the exception. It might be necessary to display the caught exceptions manually, otherwise looking for an error may get very difficult.
RealHeavyDude
Well-Known Member
Actually, routine-level was introduced in OE10.1, block-level was introduced in OE11.