A
Andrew Savini
Guest
Hi Simi, My concern with this idea is that the scope for replacing the BPM portal would require a larger and more refined solution, increasing the amount of time to get a credible sample out to the community. Additionally once complete, the proprietary code is unlikely to get released in its current form, requiring further development time. I agree that by Progress using the KUIB in one of their own applications they will be working within the same constraints as their customers, and I'm keen to know how they would tweak their design around things that we currently perceive as limitations. We really do need a good example ASAP; we've been hearing about this product for a while now (through marketing, beta and release), but we just can't envisage its usage for a detailed LOB app. Andrew
Continue reading...
Continue reading...