A
agent_008_nl
Guest
I think you are reacting to some messages of me to the peg also. Later today I will post a reaction on the peg to an email written by Tom Bascom (can't reach my gmail from here) that partly answers your post too, here a citation: "Time processes; I already named the separation of concerns in patterns like MVC (and later MVP,MVVM or even RVP) that evolved in other frameworks. But there is more, we now have for instance the server-push that gives extra business opportunities. Like when a record update appears on the server all clients that have that record in a grid on their screen are notified (their grids are refreshed). Some openedge / node frameworks already have that feature. Moreover you can build applications that scale better with node than with webspeed. Have a look at Robert Predigers presentations, furthermore google (no surprise ;-) is your friend. Moreover I think a request can arrive at the appserver quicker when using node (with the node4progress bridge) than when using webspeed. Others who actually measured this are welcome to comment [..]." When I wrote my posting to psdn I was asking myself "what looks like a promising web ui (with an openedge backend)". I'm not asking you to replace what satisfies you. I would even not recommend to replace your solutions because at least meteor is not yet ripe for production as far as I know. Besides I'm just a webui dummy that googled some things together and improved the thoughts a bit after discussing on the peg and privately some time ago with some people that know a lot more than I do. Rollbase: talking about "famous companies, that new tools so love to throw around". ;-) But when the marketing and sales people are from psc it's a different story for you I suppose.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...