B
Brien M. Posey
Guest
Manual File Transfers Are Riskier Than They Seem
Manual file transfers are a normal part of everyday business. On any given day, employees send emails with attachments, copy files to shared drives or use consumer-grade file transfer tools. These methods are quick, easy, familiar and they get the job done. Because these and other types of manual file transfers are so effective and so widely used, it’s easy to assume that there is no real downside to their use.
Manual file transfers don’t look risky but that’s the problem. Such transfers simply look like a part of normal day-to-day business operations. Even so, manual file transfers can introduce potential risks to security, compliance and operational resiliency, leading many organizations to adopt secure file transfer software designed for centralized management, visibility and compliance.
Why Manual File Transfers Are Risky
Imagine an organization that relies on a scheduled script to export data from a CRM system and upload it to an FTP server used by a partner. Each day, the script generates a file, names it according to a convention and places it in a designated folder for transfer. On the surface, this process seems routine and reliable. It runs in the background and requires little day-to-day attention.
However, this seemingly simple workflow can introduce heightened security and compliance risks. If the script fails or runs incorrectly, files might not be transferred. There are also risks that in the event of an error, the script could send data that is outdated, incomplete or corrupt.
Such a script may also present challenges from a compliance standpoint. The script presumably stores credentials somewhere and those credentials may or may not be stored securely. The same can also be said of the data that is being sent. Depending on the way that the script works, personally identifiable data may lack appropriate protections, such as encryption, leading many organizations to replace ad hoc tools with secure file transfer software that improves visibility and compliance readiness.
There is also the issue of visibility. If a transfer fails, is delayed or is accessed inappropriately, the organization may have no immediate way of knowing. This lack of oversight can be especially problematic for organizations operating in regulated industries, where proving how data was handled is every bit as important as securing it.
Human Error
One of the biggest risks associated with manual file transfers is that of human error. Human error becomes possible any time that a process-driven task lacks safeguards.
As an example, suppose that an employee is responsible for manually exporting a daily report and uploading it to a partner’s server. In doing so, they might select the wrong file, upload an outdated version or place the file in the wrong directory. In other cases, they might forget to perform the transfer altogether or execute it outside of the required timeframe. At best, such mistakes are disruptive to the business. At worst, they could contribute to costly compliance issues.
Managed file transfer solutions are designed to help reduce these types of risks. By automating file transfers, enforcing policy and validating files, MFT solutions take the user out of the equation, thereby lowering the likelihood of error or compliance issues.
Lack of Visibility
For businesses in regulated industries, one of the single biggest risks associated with manual file transfers is a lack of visibility into how data moves through the organization. There may be no centralized way to track what files were sent, when they were transferred, who initiated the transfer or whether the transfer was successful.
From an operational standpoint, a lack of visibility makes it tough to troubleshoot problems when they occur. The organization might not even realize that a problem has occurred until much later.
From a compliance perspective, the consequences are far more serious. Many regulatory frameworks require organizations to maintain detailed records of how sensitive data has been handled. In the event of a compliance audit, the inability to produce accurate transfer logs can quickly become a major problem.
Secure file transfer software can help address these challenges by providing centralized monitoring, detailed audit logs and real-time alerts. Organizations gain the ability to track every single file transfer. This level of visibility strengthens compliance and can make it easier to troubleshoot problems when they arise.
Weak Security
Another potential risk associated with manual file transfers is that many commonly used tools such as FTP servers, shared network folders and even ad hoc cloud storage services were designed for convenience rather than security. Even if the organization itself does not adopt such tools, shadow IT remains an ever-present threat with end users adopting tools meant for consumers or tools that are outdated.
For example, traditional FTP transmits data in clear text, meaning that sensitive data lacks even the most basic encryption. While there are more secure alternatives like SFTP or HTTPS-based tools, security is not guaranteed. These tools do encrypt the data that is being transferred but the overall level of security largely depends on how the tool has been configured. This is why many organizations replace legacy tools with secure file transfer software that helps standardize security controls and reduce the risk of misconfiguration.
For businesses in regulated industries, shadow IT operations create significant risk. Organizations are often required to enforce strict controls around data encryption, access management and auditability. File transfers occurring through unmanaged or insecure tools may raise regulatory concerns. Even if a tool truly is secure, the lack of any centralized oversight and audit logging will still likely lead to compliance violations.
Managed file transfer tools and secure file transfer software help address these challenges by standardizing file transfers. They support policy enforcement, integrate with IAM providers and provide centralized governance over file movement. By reducing reliance on ad hoc tools and bringing transfers under a single, controlled framework, organizations can reduce security vulnerabilities and better align themselves with regulatory requirements.
The Hidden Costs of Manual File Transfers
The most obvious way that manual file transfers can incur significant costs is through regulatory fines. However, even if an organization does not operate within a regulated industry, there can be various hidden costs that can come into play as a result of manual file transfers.
Manual file transfers occurring on a regular basis are by their very nature repetitive. Suppose that an employee spends 10 minutes each day preparing and transmitting a file. Given a five-day work week, that amounts to 50 minutes or nearly an hour per week spent on a process that could be automated. Assuming that the employee works 50 weeks per year, over a year’s time, the file transfer would consume over 41 hours annually—more than an entire work week.
More alarmingly, this process is rarely isolated to a single employee. If 25 employees across an organization each spend a similar amount of time on manual file transfers, the total exceeds 1,000 hours annually. Depending on the organization’s average hourly labor rate, manual file transfer costs can easily reach tens of thousands of dollars each year.
Additional costs can arise when problems occur, for troubleshooting and fixing the issues, as well as opportunity costs from adverse effects of failed transfers like missed deadlines or workflow disruptions.
Managed file transfer solutions can help organizations address these hidden costs by automating otherwise manual processes. By reclaiming employee time and reducing the risk of disruption, organizations can improve operational efficiency while potentially reducing costs.
A Better Option
Instead of relying on risky, time-consuming manual file transfers, organizations can consider implementing secure file transfer software that centralizes automation, security and control. Such tools can automate file transfers and are also designed to support security policies. Secure file transfer software typically provides visibility and audit-logging capabilities that are often used in regulated industries, helping organizations apply security policies consistently across the organization. To put it another way, secure file transfer software can reduce guesswork and help mitigate risks related to file transfers.
Conclusion
Although manual file transfers once had their place, they have increasingly become a poor fit for today’s heavily regulated, security-focused world.
Unfortunately, manual file transfers have become so routine that organizations often underestimate the risks they introduce. Users have relied on such tools for generations, so these types of file transfers go unnoticed as they have become overly familiar in day-to-day operations. Over time, however, manual file transfers can introduce problems that may lead to serious consequences.
What is most unsettling is that these risks tend to accumulate slowly over time. There might be an occasional missed file transfer or an untracked exchange with a third party. Individually, such occurrences might seem very insignificant. Collectively, though, they may create security risks and serious compliance violations. Worse still, such incidents may go completely undetected until they surface during a compliance audit or operational failure.
Secure file transfer software can replace insecure manual processes with a more controlled and auditable framework, helping organizations better manage security and compliance risks that require ongoing attention.
Continue reading...