M
marian.edu
Guest
Not a bit, if one doesn’t care about different types of error the code block could throw away catch-all Progress.Lang.Error is all that is needed. I’m definitively for identifying errors by type whenever possible but introducing that in AVM generated errors would probably too much of a stretch so we can live with SysError when it comes of errors generated by AVM. What I would love to see implemented is an option to add ’throws’ information of method/function/procedure definition so one knows what kind of errors to expect (extend the IDE to support that with some code completion will be nice as well). Marian Edu Acorn IT www.acorn-it.com www.akera.io +40 740 036 212
Continue reading...
Continue reading...