C
ChUIMonster
Guest
Your problem is not what you think it is. Shared memory use is expected behavior and is completely normal. It has nothing to do with the memory violation error, the corrupt block or the db crash. The fact that you are running version 9 is a much bigger problem than the fact that you can display the shared memory segments that are in use. Version 9 was conceived and coded in the 1990s. The environments that is was designed to run in have changed considerably. Many, many things are dramatically different in todays world -- security and multi-core systems memory to name just a couple of the more obvious changes. Is using v9 responsible for your crash? Probably not. It looks more like a problem with faulty hardware. If the hardware is as old and unsupported as v9 that isn't very surprising.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...