M
mopfer
Guest
Thanks to all for the input. We will use all of that advice. We do have that historical data to work from, which is how we know that we'll have some tables get large enough to need to be in their own area later. Since some of the customers that use the database in question are replicating to a SQL Server database via a tool that relies on the Progress rowids to coordinate the activity between the two databases, we don't get to do things that change the rowids of existing records very often, so we will probably end with more areas than we need today, but not an area for every table and index. Thank you very much.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...