A
agent_008_nl
Guest
I do not see what this comment of Lahman reacts upon (the "missive" he names in the first sentence). I cannot google it either. It is not clear to me what you are trying to say with this, Thomas. In this text also Lahman is railing against implementation inheritance as it is commonly used. With overrides etc. Isn't it? And that is what my criticism is about also. The Szyperski article is a lot clearer I find.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...