[progress Communities] [progress Openedge Abl] Forum Post: Re: Dataserver Platform

  • Thread starter Thread starter ymaisonn
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

ymaisonn

Guest
Hi Simi, Technically speaking the Oracle Dataserver can be deployed on either platform. Here are 3 possible architectures that you may use: Configuration 1: Machine A: Windows Client application Machine B: Linux or Windows Oracle DataServer broker Oracle Client Interface (OCI) Machine C: Linux Oracle RDBMS The dataserver is configured as a broker. The client connects to the broker using the Progress networking protocol (as it is the case for OpenEdge client/server connections). The oracle dataserver communicates with the remote Oracle RDBMS via the Oracle networking, using the OCI libraries. You will need one DataServer license for machine B. Configuration 2: Machine A: Windows Client application Machine B: Linux Oracle DataServer broker Oracle Client Interface (OCI) Oracle RDBMS This configuration is similar to the previous configuration except that Oracle DataServer broker resides on the same machine as the Oracle RDBMS. The communication flow between the client the dataserver and the Oracle DB remains the same Configuration 3: Machine A: Windows Client application Oracle DataServer (broker or self-service) Oracle Client Interface (OCI) Machine B: Linux Oracle RDBMS In the last scenario the Oracle DataServer resides on the same machine as the client application. Therefore, if the application deployed on multiple machines, you need a Dataserver license for each of those machines along with the OCI. The client application can connect to the dataserver in client server mode (dataserver broker configuration) or in shared memory (self-service). Conclusion: Each configuration has its pros and cons. Config 3 (in self service mode) may provide great performance but may be questionable when it comes to scalability and maintenance On the other hand config 1 has an advantage when it comes to scalability and maintenance, but the distributed architecture may cause extra overhead. Regards, Yannick

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top