[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: Memory Mapped PLs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grant Holman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Grant Holman

Guest
I've been comparing regular (non-memory mapped) PL files to memory mapped versions (on Windows 2012) and can't detect any difference in memory usage. I ran multiple clients using first regular PLs then MM eqivalents and memory usage appeared to be the same for both. My understanding is that MM PLs will be loaded up once only and shared between all Progress clients (as opposed to regular where PLs where each client is using its own copy). Admittedly I'm no memory guru, so I may just not be analysing the figures shown in Task Manager correctly. Any tips appreciated.

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top