This is what I have
1. _user table has been populated and _can-read, _can-write etc used as well. Currently SQL92 seems to use the _can-read etc privs to block access – which is good. I didn’t think it used these though but obviously it does - correct?
2. Does the "grant select on table1 to userx" use a different set of tables for permissions? Does it override the _can-write etc? IE Can I use _can-read for 4GL and the SQL tables for ODBC?
Ta
Murray
1. _user table has been populated and _can-read, _can-write etc used as well. Currently SQL92 seems to use the _can-read etc privs to block access – which is good. I didn’t think it used these though but obviously it does - correct?
2. Does the "grant select on table1 to userx" use a different set of tables for permissions? Does it override the _can-write etc? IE Can I use _can-read for 4GL and the SQL tables for ODBC?
Ta
Murray