Forum Post: Re: Update ... Buffer-pool "alternate"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thomas Mercer-Hursh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

Thomas Mercer-Hursh

Guest
OK, I probably should have been more clear. This tool is not intended to be used on an incremental.df. So, DROP, for example, is a reason to just quit right on the spot because it means that this assumption is violated. I would be inclined to think the same of UPDATE, except that in the Alternate buffer-pool case, it is in the base .df. I guess this means that I need to check whether it is a BUFFER-POOL statement or something else. Is there anything else that could be in a non-incremental .df?

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top