P
pedromarcerodriguez
Guest
Running a probably meaningless performance test over the example I provided earlier, the OO solution is approximately 3 times slower than a direct use of the Temp Table. Test scenario I ran is creating 20000 records in the TT, and later traversing those 20000. Results have been around 600-700 ms for OO, 180-200 direct use of the TT. If that is a performance problem or not, of course is something to decide in every particular case, in most cases I think I would sacrifice this performance for the advantages of an OO approach. And I don't see as more obscure, I see it more consistent with the rest of OO code.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...