G
gus
Guest
then again, one of the comments in there is (with rspect to concurrent programming, for which i think erlang is the corrct approach): "... application programmers are too simple to decide on the best solution and no one is giving them a prescriptive, one-size-fits-all solution. So now there's demand for a one-size-fits-all solution and FP is trying to satisfy it. They're having a hard time dealing with reality though." gus, Human Capital (i.e. property) of Progress Software gus@progress.com > On Oct 15, 2015, at 4:07 AM, agent_008_nl wrote: > > Update from Progress Community [https://community.progress.com/] > > agent_008_nl [https://community.progress.com/members/agent_5f00_008_5f00_nl] > > About why it might be a fatal action to ignore developments in functional languages: > > www.fpcomplete.com/.../the-downfall-of-imperative-programming [https://www.fpcomplete.com/blog/2012/04/the-downfall-of-imperative-programming] > > (this one is not academic) > > View online [https://community.progress.com/community_groups/openedge_general/f/26/p/20418/73327#73327] > > You received this notification because you subscribed to the forum. To unsubscribe from only this thread, go here [https://community.progress.com/community_groups/openedge_general/f/26/t/20418/mute]. > > Flag [https://community.progress.com/community_groups/openedge_general/f/26/p/20418/73327?AbuseContentId=b7673345-6352-47de-8491-d6f17a63e329&AbuseContentTypeId=f586769b-0822-468a-b7f3-a94d480ed9b0&AbuseFlag=true] this post as spam/abuse.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...