M
mihai_neagoe
Guest
Hi Orchid, The workarround from Edsel is indeed a workable solution for one of our objects. I was checking for a generic solution for this - in the workarround we do the same validation twice. This may impact the performance. We were thinking on adding a 'Check' button that the user will press before save and use the same validations as for standard save and return the messages in a Rollbase Error box. A question on this would be how to collect the data from the screen that should be the same as Rollbase is going to send for save. And here maybe it is a possibility to make it generic (the name of the object matches the temp-table name, for the fields we can probably use the integration name together with the object name)
Continue reading...
Continue reading...