J
James Palmer
Guest
I have now found an advantage to our weird habit of using -vs parameter. If the backup fails then only the volumes up to the point of failure are touched and updated. James Palmer | Application Developer Tel: 01253 785103 From: Paul Koufalis Sent: 14/02/2015 02:09 To: TU.OE.RDBMS@community.progress.com Subject: [Technical Users - OE RDBMS] Ouch! Backup Time Stamp on Windows Ouch! Backup Time Stamp on Windows Thread created by Paul Koufalis From my blog at http://wss.com/en/resources/blog: I was called in to consult at a site where the backups were exhibiting strange behaviour. The backup file was the normal 15Gb in size and the time stamp was from last night, but when they restored it in test there was no new data. In fact, the most recent data they could find was from a couple of weeks ago. Looking at the DB log file, it didn't take long to ascertain that the backups were actually failing. Read the rest here: http://wss.com/en/resources/blog/entry/ouch-backup-time-stamp-on-windows Stop receiving emails on this subject. Flag this post as spam/abuse. This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
Continue reading...
Continue reading...