A
agent_008_nl
Guest
First that came to my mind when I wrote "opening up to the read world" is taking part in the microservices world. I see a great potential for this architecture. But I have afterthoughts also that have to do with the closed nature of psc (the nda's and bureaucracy surrounding this whole ccs project being a clear sign), and psc with it's abundance of proprietary and expensive products that have at least in part a hard time competing with the opensource movement. At the base of my frustration stands my own position. I have explained that before but in case you did not read it: I'm a dutch contractor with openedge as main expertise. Over the years I have seen many companies leaving openedge in Holland, and none starting to use it. Nowadays most work is on legacy. I don't feel like doing this the rest of my life. Furthermore concerning this ccs project: I would appreciate psc taking the position of thoughtleader, not thought follower. It's as with politics. I do not vote for weak leaders following the vox populi. This microservicestrend is already running a couple of years and seemingly no one writing in these groups has heard of it before (of course there are silent readers that have knowledge, Julian f.e. I suspect). In what bubble do you live? Psc should be the first here signaling and valuing the trends! It could have prepared the language and tools to be able to take part in the microservices world now, but it did not.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...