[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Is there a good approach to defining temp-table/prodataset as class property?

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mike Fechner

Guest
Peter, I’m going to quote you on the LIKE … (99 web handlers ought to be enough for everyone). It’s really a bad practice, to tie anything that might appear in an Interface (temp-table) to an implementation detail (database schema). Von: Peter Judge Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2019 17:26 An: TU.OE.Development@community.progress.com Betreff: RE: [Technical Users - OE Development] Is there a good approach to defining temp-table/prodataset as class property? Update from Progress Community Peter Judge For the former, there's a tool in the data dictionary to generate an include with a temp-table definition. Datasets would need relationship information which is not in the db schema. Or you can use LIKE for temp-table definitons. View online You received this notification because you subscribed to the forum. To unsubscribe from only this thread, go here . Flag this post as spam/abuse.

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top