G
goo
Guest
OK, but should I use a FOR FIRST instead? Sendt fra min iPhone 15. feb. 2018 kl. 11:03 skrev James Palmer : Update from Progress Community James Palmer find first is fine if you genuinely couldn't care which record you get if there are multiple. I suppose it's fine if you're searching on a unique index (although that might change in future). The point of find without the first is that if you have multiple results satisfying the where clause you handle that and inform the user that something is wrong rather than making an assumption. I always used find first before, and likewise was never bitten. BUT, having changed my ways to omit the first I have encountered a number of situations where I /could/ have been bitten. View online You received this notification because you subscribed to the forum. To unsubscribe from only this thread, go here . Flag this post as spam/abuse.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...