G
GregHiggins
Guest
Whoever taught you that "NO-ERROR" is a solution to this (or, for that matter, most any) problem did you a disservice. My point, however opaquely stated, was that you should be using the tests I outlined: FOR EACH attribs WHERE attribs.flow = 'orders' and num-entries ( attribs.objectID, "/" ) gt 1 AND ENTRY(2,attribs.ObjectID,"/") = 'EF23011' I know that for each will implicitly fulfill the available test, I suspect that num-entries is sufficient to implicitly test attribs.objectID ne ? and attribs.objectID gt "" . Under the rules of short circuiting, the num-entries test must come before the ENTRY test. If we were nitpicky, we might require ... 'orders' and ( ( ) and ( ) ) but I'm reasonably sure we're OK without the additional parens.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...