D
dbeavon
Guest
I reported this to progress a couple months ago. There is now a KB to show that client-server connections may not pick up online schema changes the same way as shared-memory connections. Here is the KB: knowledgebase.progress.com/.../raw-transfer-statement-failed-due-to-stale-schema-for-table-abc It seems surprising that a client-server connection wouldn't be able to pick up the schema changes (not even if that remote client application is stopped and restarted). One would guess that client-server connections are even more "decoupled" from the database (than their shared-memory counterparts) and that they would be less technically demanding. IE. it seems that these remote clients would place fewer restrictions/requirements on the database insofar as when or how schema changes are applied.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...