D
dbeavon
Guest
Note that any pasoe msagent process will auto-magically start using the new date {yyyy-MM-dd} for its agent logs. This works for ABL applications that are actively running within PASOE. Here is the KB, in case it isn't clear that the feature is part of the product already: knowledgebase.progress.com/.../Can-PASOE-agent-logs-be-rolled-over-based-on-file-size But it sounds like you are saying that the -T property wouldn't be able to auto-magically respect the changing date the way the agent logs do... It seems to me like it would be just as easy for the rolling date to be used for the purposes of the temp directory. Any new ABL sessions should pick up a the current directory name as they are being created. I believe that the -T is provided as a local property for a new ABL session ... and old sessions can continue to use a different directory than new ones (until the old ones are finally trimmed out). (Since you said it, I'm curious about how you are using "AVM" in the context of pasoe. Are you saying that each ABL session within a msagent process is running a distinct "AVM"? Ie. there are several mini-AVM's hosted in an msagent process. That is how I would use the term, but it seems to be open to discussion.)
Continue reading...
Continue reading...