D
dbeavon
Guest
>> It only uses 25% of CPU. You can compare this to the number of cores. If you have four cores, then you are essentially running a thread with exactly 100% usage of a single core. It is not really possible for your ABL session's code to use more CPU than that. You didn't say how much time it took to run your test after removing the method call. Did you at least save about 1 second (ie ~1531ms ?) Since this is ABL we're talking about, I know that 1,000,000 iterations of a method invocation will not be free. 
The good news is that you already have something that you can package up and send to Progress tech support. I would be very eager to get that performance hotfix too, if one becomes available. Please keep us in the loop.
Continue reading...
The good news is that you already have something that you can package up and send to Progress tech support. I would be very eager to get that performance hotfix too, if one becomes available. Please keep us in the loop.Continue reading...