B
Blake Stanford
Guest
Irfan, Okay, l misstated the memory consumption results. The memory averages were from a Multi-session Agent with 5 sessions and the combined memory of 5 Classic Agents after running the various tests (not at startup). Are you saying that a Multi-session agent with N sessions will consume less memory than the same number of Classic Agents or that in total PASOE should consume less memory because one might need fewer MS-Agent sessions than Classic Agents? If the latter, then wouldn't we would need to move away from using bound connections thus introducing the additional overhead of context management? I also ran tests with 5 concurrent clients running on 5 different sessions and found the performance results to be the virtually the same Classic always outperformed PASOE. I'm not sure I understand how putting more load on will change the performance? Note: These are somewhat primitive tests with out-of-the-box tuning. Thx, Blake
Continue reading...
Continue reading...