[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: NetApp

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thomas Mercer-Hursh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

Thomas Mercer-Hursh

Guest
One of the posters on the thread about Pure which stimulated me to ask about it here has just said: In addressing network latency, the networks that support storage are either high-bandwidth Ethernet (10GbE and above), or FibreChannel (designed as a very low latency protocol specifically for connecting storage arrays to servers). Network latency, as a rule, is very, very low, measured in nanoseconds (whereas storage latencies are microseconds or milliseconds). Usually, network latency is far less of a performance detractor than the storage media or the application itself. TMF: Re: PURE STORAGE. Have to read this / Saul's Investing Discussions This seems counter to what I have been hearing from the DB experts here. What do you think?

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top