G
gus
Guest
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 7:01 AM, marian.edu wrote: > > there is no technical reason to impose same restrictions as for static syntax (the prove is this just works) sorry i was not being clear. let me try again. what i meant to say is that the rules for static and dynamic should be the same and static ought to be changed to match the dynamic ones. The dynamic ones work because the names are in quotes. But Laura is the compiler expert and it is not for me to say how hard or practical such a change would be.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...