M
marian.edu
Guest
That’s just because of your last parameter is an output one and you pass one of the temp-table field as value holder… that’s perfectly ok if you have a record available at the time of invoke so 4gl can go ahead and set the output value into that field, not the case here as you’re doing the call out of the for-each loop. What you want to achieve it’s possible, just need a little bit of extra coding to get there… hint, a dynamically generated temp-table to hold output parameters can be helpful
Marian Edu Acorn IT www.acorn-it.com www.akera.io +40 740 036 212
Continue reading...
Continue reading...