[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: CDC policies and OM latches

  • Thread starter Thread starter George Potemkin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

George Potemkin

Guest
> Were there any objects in the secondary cache, according to promon R&D 1 13? 09/13/18 Status: Shared Resources 10:36:49 Active transactions: 481 Lock table entries in use: 35235 of 1500000 Lock table high water mark: 776635 Primary object cache (-omsize): Total: 2000 Used: 1176 Pinned: 0 Secondary object cache (-omsize): Total: 2000 Used: 164 Pinned: 0 Primary MT cache (-mtpmsize): Total: 1024 Used: 0 Pinned: 0 Secondary MT cache (-mtpmsize): Total: 1024 Used: 0 Pinned: 0 5 min later 09/13/18 Status: Shared Resources 10:42:15 Active transactions: 496 Lock table entries in use: 33006 of 1500000 Lock table high water mark: 776635 Primary object cache (-omsize): Total: 2000 Used: 1176 Pinned: 0 Secondary object cache (-omsize): Total: 5120 Used: 164 Pinned: 0 Primary MT cache (-mtpmsize): Total: 1024 Used: 0 Pinned: 0 Secondary MT cache (-mtpmsize): Total: 1024 Used: 0 Pinned: 0 > Was -omsize set to 2000 at DB start or increased online? -omsize 2000 at startup and it was increased online to 5000

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top