[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: CCSBE – time for a new revision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter David Abdala
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

David Abdala

Guest
Ok, so the message is really wrong, should be "requires registration" and not "Not found". I did implement CCS and the CCSBE too (all the CSS specs actually). The whole implementation is available on GitHub: github.com/.../NSRA-CCS To be honest I find the BE specification overly complex, and see no use case for the query parts stuff. Having a way of specifying an ABL criteria (and/or an SQL criteria) is more than enough to me. Take into consideration I'm not a CCS user, and as such I don't really know the use cases it is supouse to cover. I've just provided a CCS way of accesing NSRA, which is somehow a restricted use case. Thats the main reason I asked for a test suite, to actually see how are things suposed to be used.

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top