M
Mike Fechner
Guest
I think the second ADM1 should have been ADM2, right? Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards, Mike Fechner Geschäftsführer / Director Consultingwerk Ltd. Unter Käster 1 50667 Köln / Germany Tel.: +49 221 / 6 77 88 55 0 Fax.: +49 221 / 6 77 88 55 5 Mobil: +49 171 / 4 357 484 mike.fechner@consultingwerk.de http://www.consultingwerk.de http://blog.consultingwerk.de Experts in OpenEdge & .NET Am 29.05.2014 um 17:58 schrieb "Håvard Danielsen" bounce-hdaniels@community.progress.com : The term ADM is ambiguous, so to clarify: ------------- ADM1 uses _File._template to find the template record in the database table in order to initialize values for a new record. This was actually a rather common way to generically initialize a new record outside a transaction without doing a create when dynamic code and buffers did not exist. One can make the code “MT-compliant” and replace the template usage with dynamic code - adm/method/tableio.i adm-add-record. ADM1 uses rowids as record identifiers for navigation and update and cannot be considered "partition-safe".
Continue reading...
Continue reading...