Forum Post: Re: (un)expected Behaviour "for Each"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marc Fellman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Marc Fellman

Guest
The num-entries option is indeed one that I would do if it were a static for each. I'm now moving to a situation where I go through the for each dynamically (with as few criteria as possible) and do a find first (dynamically) on the found record (where I can add the no-error) to see of the additional stuff (like the entry(2,...)) validates correctly. Fortunately it is already a stripped and optimized subset of a 100 million plus number of records :)

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top