Forum Post: Re: Pointer Memory, Linked Lists And Trees.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garry Hall
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Garry Hall

Guest
Do you need to interface to a DLL/shared object? Using memptrs just for the sake of using memptrs is a lot of code whose purpose would not be readily obvious to the user. If you just have to represent an abstract data type in some language, I'd probably go with OOABL objects instead, implementing an interface with Next and Previous methods/properties. If you do have to access a DLL/shared object, take into consideration the PROCESS-ARCHITECTURE, as the size of pointers changes between 32-bit and 64-bit. You'd probably want to use at least 11.3 for this.

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top