J
James Palmer
Guest
Thanks both. I realise there's a problem with either approach. The question was posed to me by a colleague in a theoretical approach, so yes the ideal answer would be to find a different approach! 
Thanks for the thoughts Mike. Confirms my suspicions! I suppose that if the child table were in an area with a different RPB (it's likely to be a smaller table I'd have thought), that whilst the individual records may well be bigger than extent/field solution that you may find many records don't take up much more space. I could be wrong of course!
Continue reading...
Thanks for the thoughts Mike. Confirms my suspicions! I suppose that if the child table were in an area with a different RPB (it's likely to be a smaller table I'd have thought), that whilst the individual records may well be bigger than extent/field solution that you may find many records don't take up much more space. I could be wrong of course! Continue reading...