P
Peter Mellow
Guest
REST is being looked at but no time frame on it right now. But we do see it as very important. Peter From: asthomas [mailto:bounce-asthomas@community.progress.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 11:55 AM To: TU.OE.Development@community.progress.com Subject: RE: json for 10.2B ? RE: json for 10.2B ? Reply by asthomas Hi Peter, Pity - this is such a nice thing to have built into the language - and we often work with clients that are not ready to move to 11 yet. There are many customers till on 10.2B (and some even older). It is difficult to create generic tools that work on 10.2B+ without having to spend huge amounts of time on bulding our own verisons of things like this. On a similar note - and with a risk if hi-jacking Julian's thread here... are there any plans for adding a built in REST or more generic HTTPClient object into the ABL? There are several ABL based ones out there using sockets (oehoive built by Julian has one, I know Consultingwerk have one in their toolset). But something like this is strategically important to have built into the ABL - so that we can just get on with using and consuming things like REST services without having to buld the base tools first. Stop receiving emails on this subject. Flag this post as spam/abuse.
Continue reading...
Continue reading...