M
medu
Guest
On 04/09/2014 01:22 AM, Nigel Allen wrote: From: Nigel Allen Post: RE: For First, For Last, For Each Posted in: OpenEdge Development Link: http://community.progress.com/technicalusers/f/19/p/9396/36032.aspx#36032 In process.- thanks Brian. To be honest, I've been aware of this issue for longer than I care to remember and just acepted that "that's the way it is". It was only the other day that I was retro-fixing someone else code that I thought about it. I'm now wondering if fixing this bug^h^h^hfeature will break anyone's code. Ah well - can't make an omlette....... don't think anyone using 'by' in a for first/last would actually count on actually getting a randomly record that satisfy the where clause... if there is they can easily fix the code by removing the 'by' option
what would probably make a nice omelette, will be fixing the buffer scope for the same for find/last statements
N/ -- You were sent this email because you opted to receive email notifications when someone created a new thread. To unsubscribe from: - ...only this thread, disable notifications at http://community.progress.com/technicalusers/f/19/p/9396/36032.aspx#36032. - ...all email notifications from Progress Community, navigate to "Settings", click on the "Email" tab, then under the "Email Configuration" section, set Send Notifications to "No". -- m.edu keep it simple http://www.ganimede.ro http://ro.linkedin.com/in/marianedu medu@ganimede.ro mobile: +40 740 036 212 skype: marian.edu
Continue reading...


Continue reading...