Forum Post: Re: Catch Output In Batchmode

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian K. Maher
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Brian K. Maher

Guest
Sublam, Sure there is. Simply use NO-ERROR on every statement where it is an option, add a call to a routine that walks through error-status:num-messages and sends the messages to where ever you want them to go. Is this clumsy and (from my perspective) painful? Absolutely. Using log-manager and processing the resulting file is cleaner. Brian

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top