Forum Post: Re: Bfx: Field Too Large For A Data Item. Try To Increase -s. (42)

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

agent_008_nl

Guest
You believe it works as you interpreted it afterwards you mean. Might be your clarifation is ok, I have no idea. You Gus?But anyway, I don't like to change parameters without knowing what is going on, where exactly the error comes from. Timeconsuming, but you learn something. This kind of differences between a plain find and the dfferent dynamic finds are not nice to have, the cause of the error (or the statement where iot occurred) was timeconsuming to trace.

Continue reading...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

G
  • Locked
[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: How fast Progress utilities read the disks?
Replies
0
Views
1K
George Potemkin
G
A
  • Locked
Forum Post: Re: Bfx: Field Too Large For A Data Item. Try To Increase -s. (42)
Replies
0
Views
285
agent_008_nl
A
A
  • Locked
[Progress Communities] [Progress OpenEdge ABL] Forum Post: RE: Functional programming in ABL
Replies
0
Views
597
agent_008_nl
A
G
  • Locked
Forum Post: Re: Bfx: Field Too Large For A Data Item. Try To Increase -s. (42)
Replies
0
Views
472
gus
G
F
  • Locked
Forum Post: Re: Bfx: Field Too Large For A Data Item. Try To Increase -s. (42)
Replies
0
Views
432
Fernando Souza
F
Top