Search results

  1. L

    HTML Email (data > 32000 bytes) - Possible VB workaround?

    Well there you go ... though you would have thought it would be easier... something like ASSIGN chMailItem:HTMLBody = chMailItem:HTMLBody + 'Appended Text'. (like you suggested eariler) But that sort of programming is too easy for us Progress programmers.
  2. L

    HTML Email (data > 32000 bytes) - Possible VB workaround?

    No, you were quite specific - I just did a MSDN search on HTMLBody and looked at related methods, and (erroneously) assumed they were both accessible to you. Sorry for red herring.:blush1:
  3. L

    HTML Email (data > 32000 bytes) - Possible VB workaround?

    Well, I don't know that it will work, but let us know if it does. Cheers.
  4. L

    HTML Email (data > 32000 bytes) - Possible VB workaround?

    Adapting http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/wss/wss/_cdo_imessage_htmlbody.asp [Visual Basic] Dim iMsg As New CDO.Message ' ... .MimeFormatted defaults to True on the new message ... Dim strHTML As String ' string in which to build up HTML body ' ... Set...
  5. L

    HTML Email (data > 32000 bytes) - Possible VB workaround?

    It's possible you could insert the text file into the HTML using the AddRelatedBodyPart Method.
  6. L

    HTML Email (data > 32000 bytes) - Possible VB workaround?

    There is an AddRelatedBodyPart method which allows you to insert graphics etc. into the message (I just looked it up), perhaps you can figure out how to use that. Failing that, until someone comes up with a good suggestion, or the appropriate method calls, it looks like you will have to send...
  7. L

    HTML Email (data > 32000 bytes) - Possible VB workaround?

    The first suggestion may not work, you are possibly right, but the second one should if there was such a method. Can the HTMLBody be sourced from a text file? ie. output HTML to temporary text file, then load that into your object?
  8. L

    HTML Email (data > 32000 bytes) - Possible VB workaround?

    Is it possible to split the body into multiple variables, and string them together when creating the HTML? eg: OutlookObject:CreateHTML(var1 + var2 + ...). or OutlookObject:AddHTML(varN). These are madeup method names, I don't know the com calls, but you get the idea.
  9. L

    Slogan???

    ABL = ... Approaching BigTime Lawsuit? http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2006/06/28/3_more_firms_subpoenaed_in_options_probe/
  10. L

    Need to Change Page in Frame

    (Assuming ADM2) You need RUN SelectPage... eg. something like: /* Next */ RUN SelectPage ( DYNAMIC-FUNCTION('getCurrentPage':U) + 1 ).
  11. L

    Is it a Bug or a feature?

    Run-Time Query Analyser update: There was a bug in my code, but this only counted for about 5% of the problem. Good try, but Default Index info is recorded. Yes, it is temp table stuff, introduced as an 'enhancement' in 9.1D06. I am on 9.1D07...
  12. L

    DynToolKit BUILD 2006177192657 Released

    Scott, I don't use dynamic queries much, but that looks useful, and as a developer I appreciate your never ending (free!) contributions. I think you should get some sleep now. Lee
  13. L

    upgrade 9.1D to OpenEdge 10

    Yes. See eg: KB P3022 Title: "Should I recompile my application after upgrading to a newer version of Progress?" http://tinyurl.com/okdss KB P94471 Title: "How to migrate application code between Progress versions ?" http://tinyurl.com/p2xac
  14. L

    Future Of Progress Rdbms/4gl

    But you are right, a lot of the OpenEdge (Progress Version 10) enhancements are very positive, and things certainly look brighter than they did a few years ago.
  15. L

    Future Of Progress Rdbms/4gl

    No. As has been pointed out to you several times, a new version (Progress Version 10) has been released, with a rebranding 'OpenEdge'/'ABL'. It's still Progress RDBMS/4GL, but enhanced with a different name.
  16. L

    Is it a Bug or a feature?

    An excellent point - I hadn't considered them, as I didn't realise default indexes weren't recorded in _index. Should be easy to test anyway...
  17. L

    Is it a Bug or a feature?

    I also thought this, and indeed the application did show less anomolies when run direct from icon. However, there were still indexes being thrown up which don't seem to make any sense, and even indexes which don't seem to exist at all (there is no corresponding record in the _index table in...
  18. L

    Is it a Bug or a feature?

    Yes, but I would only ever use zqil on development db anyway, because as you say it fills the log very quickly with garbage. However, I have also found that it seems to report queries and indexes which I can't relate to searches in my application, which renders it pretty much useless anyway...
  19. L

    Is it a Bug or a feature?

    What is the difference in this case? Really, I don't know. My understanding is that . is undocumented comment shorthand. I ran an empty procedure last night in the Appbuilder with zqilv and no database attached. Lot's of errors. (This was after I had been running in the same session with a...
  20. L

    Is it a Bug or a feature?

    As you haven't clarified what offended you, I don't know what I'm supposed to forget, but I will attempt to do so nonetheless.
Top