Search results

FWIW, On the specific point of monitoring dynamic (and static) queries: There is a util you can download from my home page that will report runtime queries. ie. it reports index usage as the application runs. However, its a Windows frontend for the zqil output - you will need to adapt it for...

Wha?? You mean all those people on LinkedIn with huge networks aren't actually highly experienced multiple-recommended gurus I could trust with my life? Please add me as an endorsement for the quality of your services. I charge 100 Euros for this function btw. Alternatively, to...

I think this is why it is taking so long to get the Peg restored. The 'Recovery Team' are sitting over keyboards going: Google > Cached > Select > Copy > Paste ... Google > Cached > Select > Copy > Paste ... Google > Cached > Select > Copy > Paste ... Google > Cached > Select > Copy >...

(For anyone unused to using Google's cache: Press the cached link under the returned result to see the page, not the direct link)

Look at your editing Options (eg. on old systems: Appbuilder > Options > Editing Options > Options > Keyword Case > Upper Case & Auto Case Keywords)

Oh yeah, if you don't make much progress, and you can't reproduce the error in test/dev and don't know what steps the user is taking to produce it, try sticking a debug log on the offending user to catch when and where it happens.

Has anything changed over the last week, deployment-wise? As indicated in the error description, the error is associated with rcode execution. Is there something different about this user? eg. Are they new? Do they have access to different rcode (Check timestamps)? Do they have...

But the various ADM2 whitepapers give a better overview than the standard documentation. http://www.psdn.com/library/kbcategory.jspa?categoryID=1352 See also Mike Lonskis book on the subject. http://www.allegroconsultants.com/codingsmart/ Best of all would be some mentoring - it's...

OpenEdge Documentation > Development Collection > ADM Reference

Yoachan: It may also be a good idea to suggest (diplomatically) your 'senior' reads it as well, as his mentoring appears to be harmful in this case. You could have proved your (correct) suspicion for yourself by having two sessions (in effect two users) attempt to lock two different records...

It's hard to argue with that, considering the regular, quite vehement discussions on that subject.

I would be amazed if that was the case - more likely it's just not accessible through the web yet.

ProgressTalk used to do it for free. :rolleyes:

FWIW Ok, for anyone who primarily accesses it through the web front end, and has (like me) assumed it has been down for 3 weeks, it appears to be functioning as normal through the email subscription list. Obviously I completely missed this notice highlighted at the top of the home page before:

Just curious - I'm sure it will be back up soon.

You may also like to look at the -rand parameter, so regardless of implementation your repeated checks don't check the same records. Not having had much use for the RANDOM function, I don't know how restrictive its limitations are in your case, but be aware there are degrees of randomness in...

Where? Looking back I see I (mis?)read 'college' as a misspelling of 'colleague' (like DevTeam I think), so perhaps you are right. I also thought this was a possibility, but I'm not sure telling them to 'only use one variable' is a good way to do it. Whatever, OP will get brownie points...

The requirement to work with one variable is stupid, unless it's an academic exercise. And even then it's stupid. Is someone having a joke at your expense? So, you could present the recursive solution, then lean backward in your chair, arms crossed over your head, and chuckle knowingly to...

Simpler (untested): FUNCTION rev RETURNS CHAR(INPUT ll AS CHAR). if ll = 'yohn' then return 'nhoy'. else return ?. END. DISP rev("Yohn").

Cost cutting due to the credit crunch has gone too far. They expect us to work with nothing.