Search results

I was puzzledly looking at your code, wondering how it could possibly run and - if it would run - what it should do. Still not convinced that I know what you are trying to achieve here. The example does not compile in 11.7, let alone run. I think you are trying to use run-time parameters. If...

Not quite sure what you want to achieve, but I use below code to enforce right click when the user presses the left button. Maybe this can get you on track: PROCEDURE SendMessageA EXTERNAL "user32.dll": DEFINE INPUT PARAMETER hwnd AS long NO-UNDO. DEFINE INPUT PARAMETER wmsg AS long...

I dusted off an old version of DataDigger and got it running in v9. Don't ask why I keep a copy of v9 :) Check the repo at GitHub - patrickTingen/DataDiggerV9: DataDigger for Progress v9 or simply download it here It contains both source files and .r files for v9.1D Extract the zip in...

Alternative approach: #Tray: FOR EACH tray NO-LOCK WHERE tray.tf-own = l-cus AND tray.tf-type >= l-type1 AND tray.tf-type <= l-type2 AND tray.tf-delete-date = ?: FOR EACH item NO-LOCK WHERE item.if-tray = tray.tf-tray AND...

Try this FOR EACH tray NO-LOCK WHERE tray.tf-own = l-cus AND tray.tf-type >= l-type1 AND tray.tf-type <= l-type2 AND tray.tf-delete-date = ? , EACH item NO-LOCK WHERE item.if-tray = tray.tf-tray AND item.if-delete-date = ? BREAK BY...

Cool, the most recent version is only 22 years old I found a revised version from 2009 here: https://freeframework.sourceforge.net/downloads/accepted/

Ai, guilty.....

For the past few days, I have been receiving blank emails from our ERP system. We have several places where the system mails strange things so sending mail is not uncommon. Blank emails are, though. I managed to trace the mails back to the specific server and checked the logfiles of smtpmail...

Not sure, based on your example, but my experience is that if you encounter strange problems with locking, you can do yourself an enourmous favour by using explicit buffers for each table you reference. No exceptions; always use a buffer. I've seen multiple times strange and seemingly unsolvable...

With the DataDigger, you can use the built-in query analyzer. It will report both the nr of reads and the time it takes for a query to run. You can get it here if you don't already have it

This might be a language issue (English is not my native tongue) but I think I don't understand what it is that you want to achieve. Your query looks good; you build a truly dynamic query and then attach it to the browse. So your user selects a couple of filters, you build the query, attach it...

Can you use the debugger to step inside 'isOkToFetch'? You might be able to find why it says 'no'

I am not fully sure what you are trying to do but it looks as if you are making your life extremely complicated by mixing UI and logic. You use the screen-value of your filters in the query, if I am correct. By building a dynamic query, using the actual value from the filters (not a reference to...

If I read your response, I think you may have a partially dynamic query, one that uses or does not use fields from the frame. A fully dynamic query would look something along the example attached. Look in the choose event of the button In this demo I just copied the records from the customer...

Indeed, that was what I meant, but I can see your case for usage of frames (scrolling) so I think it is wise to stick with that. However, what might be possible is to delete the widget when you move it from one frame to another and then re-create it in the new frame, like @Cringer mentioned.

In that case, perhaps another way to look at it is to determine the coordinates of the editor when you drop it. Based on that you know where they want the shipment to be in the schedule. Then at that point change the data underneath and just redraw the screen. No need for reparenting and - bonus...

I don't think it is possible at all to re-parent a widget. I tried building a small example, but when I try to set the new parent for an editor, Progress forbids this: But you can just move the field around, test it with the attached program. Uncomment the lines in the procedure...

We found the issue. The new Outlook version handles shared folders and caching different than the old one. More info: Manage download settings for shared mail folders in Cached Exchange mode in Outlook - Outlook

I don't think this is the issue; we can connect to Outlook without any problem, it fails when we try to access the "Folders" property. We are pretty sure it had something to do with permissions / authorization. When we try to read our own (a non-shared) mailbox it works fine.

Yes, we handled that in the trust centre