Search results

I meant your current effort and the actual HTML code so that we can see what you have constructed.

Perhaps if you attached an example of one of the e-mails someone knowledgeable about e-mails would be able to point at what was wrong.

I was very fond of working in X. Something about the whole experience which just blew Windows away ... especially with Windows back then. Even ChUI looked good. But, when PSC committed to Windows, not much choice.

Cringer ... it depends :) Back in Version 6, I did an implementation of Varnet on X-Windows which people thought was a GUI, just because the simple ChUI forms looked so much better on X-Windows. It amused a bunch of folks!

It seems to me that you have three distinct potential problems: 1. Composing a valid e-mail containing the desired image, regardless of how sent. 2. Interfacing with Outlook to make that e-mail appear to have been *sent* from the Outlook client. 3. Potentially dealing with any issues specific to...

Don't know about Outlook, but this sounds exactly like what happens for me with sending in plain text vs sending in HTML.

In particular, I might note that it is a frequent pattern in adding new functionality to an existing app to simply tag on a couple of fields to an existing table to support that new functionality. What is missed in doing this is an analysis for normalization. As a result, one often ends up...

But also the sort of refactoring which is likely to be amenable to automation. I'm not belittling the job, just pointing out that it is good practice to recognize when something is done wrong by current best practice and to consider what might be done to fix it properly instead of always doing...

Alternatively, create a class with the desired functionality and revise the includes and references to use the new class. More work, but much cleaner in the end.

when it comes to internet explorer it is not working properly Somehow a very familiar line ...

That was my point. If one is at that kind of limit, then there are bound to be many compelling reasons to switch to Enerprise.

BTW, if that is the case, it seems like a strong argument for getting off of Workgroup on general principles.

And that limit is 60?

Note that -n is not the same thing as licensed user count. It might be worth reviewing your type of user license, who is actually using it in which way (e.g., multiple sessions by the same person or on the same device), and the like. This might allow you to either raise -n and still be within...

True ... so Squirrel support? :)

Indeed, sounds like a call to support is indicated, provided the OP is on support. Further reason to do it a different way.

While this doesn't answer your question, I wonder why you would use a SQL query to do what a dump already does.

You might try showing the query and the table indices so that we have at least a little information to go on. One might also ask what use is a query that returns over 4 billion rows...

Scroll down, there are 4 jobs boards at the bottom.

Still no sponsor label under Tom's name ...