Search results

Today, November 2016, what is the star Progress app? Still Mfgpro(qad)?

STD-0298 Use gpbrparm.i to pass parameters to lookups Lookups created via Browse Maintenance often need runtime data to provide the proper filter for the query. Passing data from the Progress program to the lookup is limited because the lookup is not run directly from the Progress program...

You would have better help if share more info like os environment, progress version, gui/char etc. And of course, the code. My guess: use RETURN NO-APPLY if validation fails.

So, the short answer is: no

Mike, For our mates is easy to say "upgrade"!!! I will say it too, UPGRADE! there you go. But I think I understand your situation, it's usual developers don't have vote and minimal voice when is necessary to invest $$$$ on upgrades. But your company is on V9, you must convice your managers...

You need to use BROWSE. It can be static or dynamic. Here a dynamix example Progress KB - Sample Code to Create Dynamic Browser

Shame on you! :p

I would add to Tom's comments, always use NO-LOCK or EXCLUSIVE-LOCK. Always define as NO-UNDO your vars def (like 99.99% of times). You don't mention your progress version and env, but usually is better to use FOR FIELDS() instead FIND.

The data dictionary is not for see the data. You can do a FOR EACH thetable: DISPLAY thetable. END. Or use DataDigger

def temp-table latabla like yourtable. input from yourtablefile.d. repeat transaction: create latabla. import latabla. end. input close. Important: Don't use NO-UNDO on the temp-table definition, and use the TRANSACTION on the repeat, or you will get an extra empty record.

Copied from "STD-0240" Localization tags:

CIMs (batchload) does not work with Browsers. Mfgpro programs use the var "batchrun" to change the flow of the program and work with and without batch load. IF batchrun THEN DO: SET var1 var2 ... . END. ELSE DO: ... your code with browser ... END.

second off-topic: Feminist: why not 1=Female 2=Male? :D sorry ;)

off-topic: Are you using sex field as integer in case #3 is accepted? :D

And remember, If you are doing buffer-compare inside a write trigger, the result always will be FALSE , is'nt?

I have 10.1c and we don't need to recompile if table, field or index is added. We have clear if we add an index we need to recompile for the new index can be choosed, but if we not recompile the programs keep working.

... from old peg ...

Progress KB - Home Search for **stget : out of storage. (1450).

Complicated task for a newbie. Here you can find installation docs DocumentLibrary

Maybe webservices? We have updated the exchange currency from our national bank http://www.banxico.org.mx/DgieWSWeb/DgieWS?WSDL