Search results

Thanks for updating the thread and closing the loop!

"Enjoys suffering" = "use PDSOE"? ;)

You are not obligated to use PDSOE to compile. That’s nonsense. Someone has misunderstood something. Progress sells compiler licenses for Linux. So, clearly, it is possible. There are certain things that you sort of, maybe, might, need PDSOE for in development, like generating PAAR files, but...

Did you translate that .lg file somehow or other? There are a LOT of messages whose text is strangely worded.

There is no "if you are using PASOE, change parameters X, Y, and Z like so" guidance. From a database perspective PASOE is just another client. You would make tuning changes to the db based on the planned client configuration and your expected workload - whatever that might be. If the PASOE...

Actually, I think it is good to keep it visible. You asked a question in good faith, showed code and data relevant to the problem, got an answer quickly, and confirmed that the reason was as Peter suggested. That is a very nice example of “doing it right”! We can all learn from that.

It is, of course, important to properly scope transactions but... dash ell, lower case, is not about LOCKS. That would be -L (upper case). Lower case -l is for the "local buffer". This is memory used by variables, workfiles (not temp-tables), and local copies of records...

To me it sounds like you have done “something” that you hope has resulted in replication being enabled. But whatever you did has not worked. Replication is obviously not functioning. Finding out why should be your focus. Start by explaining the steps that you took to enable it and please...

You cannot empty the extents while their status is LOCKED. You will need to fix that first. The information provided so far doesn’t help to identify why they are locked beyond the obvious “replication is not currently synchronized”. To get to the bottom of that some dsrutil status / monitor...

I would think that mostly you just want to review conmgr.properties and ensure that your script uses the same (or better) values for startup parameters and things like the number of APWs started etc. Then just stop using OEE... That is especially straight-forward if you are running on UNIX...

Seems like a bug… easy enough to fix it and test the impact.

It would be interesting to figure out how uniform the wait times are for all of the processes. From a "real world" perspective you probably don't want a situation where one or two ATM machines out of several hundred are fast but the remainder are ridiculously slow.

I'm glad that you figured it out but, just for completeness, if you had not figured it out we probably would have needed to ask you to share the content of load_vision.bat. We may have also needed to know what commands you used to create the .bd file in the first place.

I know nothing about "webM jms queue" and cannot, therefore, offer any direct help. However... If you are going to ask for help and report that you "are getting multiple errors" you should: 1) Post the actual error messages. 2) Really, post the errors. Don't talk about them or describe them...

Perhaps you could try posting the actual commands that you are using along with the messages being produced? It is generally much more fruitful to respond to the actual commands and errors than it is to attempt to infer them from brief descriptions of the results thereof…

"Unsupported" all too often means "we can't be bothered".

You understand incorrectly. Binary dump files are portable across operating systems, bitness, endianness, and (upwardly) through Progress releases. They can also be backwards compatible if they do not contain features that would prevent that (like an INT64 trying to go back to v9...) You can...

I recently had a customer that wanted to be able to revert from oe12 back to oe11 if something were to go wrong after going live with their migration. We scripted, and tested, a reverse dump & load. We would have needed 6 or 8 hours to revert a couple TB of databases. They almost exercised the...

“PUB” suggests, to me, that SQL92 was involved in some way.

Aside from what Rob said (which is excellent): This code is not the complete set of code. For one thing we are missing the definition of wkCantidad. So there is clearly more stuff going on. You really need to show the COMPLETE code in order to get useful help. The code used from Developer...