Just a quick question - 11.7.19 still (yes I know - working on it).
The Rest API for PASOE - when I delete an agent, does it just kill it, or does it let it complete what it's doing?
Thanks Rob. I've been off a few days so haven't been looking, but done now. For reference, if you use the "Report" button you can report a post to the mods with a reason rather than posting in the thread :)
Hi there. Welcome. Unfortunately IU have zero knowledge of Rollbase and how it works so can't help. Hopefully someone is. Is there nobody in your organisation that can help, or even a support contract with the vendor you can call on?
That does raise the question: how do you know it's the OS-COMMAND that's taking the time? Have you run it with the profiler enabled?
https://docs.progress.com/bundle/openedge-startup-and-parameter-reference/page/Profiler-profile.html
That will tell you exactly which line of code is the problem.
I've got no idea at all about your application, but that sounds like it's a scripted brute force event to me. And it looks like your application did what it was meant to.
Could you post an extract from broker, agent and DB log around the time of the job terminating please, rather than single lines. Some of the more experienced hands might be able to spot something you haven't. Single lines like this could just be red herrings.
I think you need to grant AUDIT_ADMIN to the user. Something like that. Never done it, but there's extra security around auditing tables for obvious reasons. You should also make sure you keep this sort of data secure at the Tableau end or else the auditing is entirely pointless.
Yeah I know all about shelling out on PAS. Unfortunately we have about 1 million OS-COMMANDS all over the codebase. :( There's just no scope for fixing them. I'm fixing this particular nut by making it soft-settable between cURL and HTTP, so we can swap back once we get to 12.8 later this year...
Still stuck on 11.7 on RHEL 8. Yes. I know. Sorry Tom. Migration to PASOE Webspeed is an absolute pain.
One of the side issues with 11.7 seems to be the flakiness of HTTP requests using the shipped classes. It works fine 95% of the time but then it gets a broken pipe. I've spoken in the past...
September will be here before you know it, and I believe PSC have done most of their other outreach stuff this year as that tends to be in the earlier half of their fiscal year.
IMO Temp Table definitions are one of the very few legitimate uses for includes these days, so long as you only include them where they are actually used! Where includes are a bane is when there's one or two includes that have hundreds of definitions and functions/procedures that are included...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.