Search results

  1. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Vendor claims that their client calls 32b dll's and until that is corrected they can not move to 64b - I'm sensing BS in that explaination. Considering that drastically lowering -spin from 800000 to 100000 had on effect, I agree that is not the issue During peak times I will see checkpoints...
  2. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    -- We have "SELF", "REMC" and "BATCH" -- Not sure how any of these parameters were originally set or justification for same. Yes, I saw that, but have no point of reference. -- -spin has already been lowered to 100,000 with no change apparent. I am considering lowering to 10,000-12,000. We...
  3. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    File Attached.
  4. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Thanks for reply Cringer. Sorry, block size is 4k. I'll have to attach a file, too large for post. kd
  5. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Sorry, meant 4096 (4k)
  6. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Hi First, yes, Oracle and later, MSSQL have the ability to run all their shared memory resources in RAM space above the 4 G line on 32b systems. I can show you how if you're really interested. 32b installs of Oracle using 5-10G buffer cache was not an unusual thing, of course, most have gone...
  7. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Oh yes, you've hit the nail on the head, however, I did not pick them and I am stuck at the moment. Let me ask you this, is there a way to confirm that the DB is in fact 32b? I ask this because the app layer is installed on the same box as the DB and I am beginning to wonder exactly what you...
  8. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Hi Thanks for the reply. See my reply to Tom's post. Thanks. kd
  9. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Thanks Tom Yes, I am aware of the year. However, this is vendor driven and their app is not ready for 64b, so I have been told. Having said that, as far back as 1990 and possibly earlier, Oracle and MSSQL have had the ability to use memory above the 4G line. So what I am implying here is that...
  10. kdefilip

    Shared Memory overflow

    -L is expressed in the log as 800000 ; is that b k M ? And while I'm at it, -Mxs set to 340 ; is that b k M as well?
  11. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Hi Experienced DBA, new to Progress so please forgive any transgressions :) We have a 32b install of OpenEdge Release 11.1.0.037 on a 64b Win2008 server. 96G Ram, 16 cores. My question, what ability does the 32b release of Progress have to see RAM above the 4G mark? I know with Oracle and...
Back
Top