Search results

  1. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Yes, I am mixing metaphors. I loosely refer to -spin as a spin lock timeout. My bad. Here is what I understand. A missed Latch attempt will hammer away at a resource to the value of -spin. If it fails to acquire the resource after that time, "latch timeout" is incremented by 1. The latch...
  2. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Our lruskips are set at 100
  3. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    I think I posted this before, but here it is in case I didn't.
  4. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    A little reluctant to do this on a production system due to my green-ness
  5. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Yes, we are in planning stages of adding more disks to this system, have already talked to vendor about splitting their files in an appropriate fashion.
  6. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    How can you tell by looking at the structure file which is the BI file. I had an indication early on that BI was on C: with the AI file. If it's not there now, I can only assume I mis-read something or it has been moved.
  7. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Primarily, what we are seeing mostly on the client side is very many -l (little L) which I believe are grabs for more temp space/file at the client. This in and of itself is not the real issue, I don't believe. So what we see is this. ClientOne with begin to gram more and more temp in...
  8. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Hi. I sent you a private message with file details, and you are correct, it would appear we have Type I and II mixed on same drive. kd
  9. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    2.3 million latch timeouts in a 10 day period 750m buffer cache who's blocks never reach the -spinskip value, at a time that -spinlocktimeout was set to 800,000. Correct me if I'm wrong, but that would indicate that the buffer is flushing faster than blocks can be moved to the MRU with given...
  10. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Hi Thanks. Some of those I have seen, but I will revisit and read in more depth. One thing I just have trouble understanding about the lruskipis. In theory, any "New" block placed in the buffer should immediately move to the top of the MRU list and as such, should not be on the list of blocks...
  11. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    also, how do I issue statements against this database such as the one suggested in the article link you sent?
  12. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Do you mean settings at the client or are there other start up parameters for the appserver?
  13. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Sorry, _proappsv I've been digging so much on this issue my brain is turning to puddy.
  14. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Not sure which latches are most important. By far OM are the most numerous, followed by LKT. Right now, MTX seem to be the only ones that are napping, 4 - 8 per any 10 second period. also note we have zero BFP yet we have very very many BUF (listed 4 times??) LRU: very many. LRU is listed...
  15. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    All the conn types are a handful of"SELF/APSV", and a majority of "REMC/ABL" CPU: 16 cores, generally we are about about 25-30% We have the process _ProMonsrv crashing frequently, which is one issue Users also often complain of frozen screens/pauses at the client
  16. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    See attached
  17. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    I guess I don't have that.
  18. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Tom, sorry, again, I'm new to progress. Where do I issue the showcfg command? Thanks.
  19. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    Okay. I thought so. Cluster size determines the frequency of checkpoints, I believe. So when I am seeing heavy checkpointing, solution is increase cluster size; correct? I assume block size on BI works the same as it does on buffer cache, etc.?
  20. kdefilip

    Question 32b Progress Above the 4G line

    I have tried debghb before in the R&D menu, it doesn't work for me. Just returns me to the menu - I wish it would because I don't know exactly where the latch waits/misses are coming from. Is it possible latch misses from the BI file are counted in this counter? For a 400 hour period it looks...
Back
Top