Search results

Been getting a few of these lately: SYSTEM ERROR: Index <index> in <table> for recid <recid> partition <n> could not be deleted. (17630) I'd rather not be running idxcheck in live unless I have to. So can I run it against a recent restore of the database as a starting point? OE 11.7, RH8.

Nobody actually said it wasn't a valid method. The OP just said that it wasn't the method they were hoping for.

I've fixed that for you

That seems to suggest to me that the startup procedure doesn't compile after your database changes but does without them. Have you checked your compile logs?

"Simply" upgrade to a modern and supported version of Progress and you will find that you will be able to use .Net in OpenEdge. I know that's not particularly helpful, but why reinvent the wheel?

Yeah something like that.

So it's just a scanner connected via a wire? The scanner should just output the scanned value as text. Create a screen on your application with a fill in and there you go.

You might want to obfuscate the Control Numbers.

Answering #2 first as it's a simple (ish) answer. No you can't run a Progress client on the scanner gun. #1 depends a little on the scanner gun. From your #2 question I assume it's not just a scanner but actually has the capability to have an interface on it. In other words the device probably...

That sort of configuration is quite common, for example if there have been instances where client sessions die within transactions as in a shared memory configuration this can bring down the database.

What's the Progress version? What is the difference in the IOPs of the 2 disks that were switched?

My calculator is fine...

Yes there is - you can have a private portal. There is obviously some cost involved here. For reassurance though, there is no reason for the admins to worry about the health data going to the cloud. There is nothing in there that will tell anyone anything about the data held within the...

Please take a look at my suggestion from May 13th. You could easily pass the customer numbers to the back end and build a temp-table there to do the query. Not only will the query not break -tok, it will also almost certainly run quicker.

I was trying to get a .Net solution working last week which was why I asked if it's Windows or *nix. Unfortunately support for ISO 8601 was only baked into .Net Core and not .Net Framework. Core has an ISOWeek class that does all the magic with very little effort. But that's not an available...

Wow that is never going to perform very well. Why not make a temp table with the customer numbers and then make the query: FOR EACH ttCustomer, each order no-lock WHERE order.co_num = "1" and order.warehouse = "primary" and order.customer = ttCustomer.customer :

Are you working on a Windows or *nix solution?

Hi there. Please provide the full command you're using to start the secondary broker. Usually that error indicates a casing issue in a parameter, or a parameter it doesn't recognise. Although - looking further I found this: -ServerType is a database startup parameter introduced in Progress...

Hi Ashwani, I've moved your question to a separate thread so that it doesn't derail the original question. It's a good question. One thing that's very important to note is the dates that various versions were released. 11.7.4 is really old. Think about how much the security world has moved on...

If you're starting from scratch I would start on OE 12.2 if at all possible. If you really can't then definitely 11.7.12. There are a lot of improvements in PASOE that you really don't want to miss out on. I also wouldn't be developing a Webspeed application in 2022. I would convert all the...