Spam

Are there moderation tools for approving new users / first posts?
Some seem to go into the approval queue, some don't. I've no idea what governs that. When a user is new, I can spam clean all their threads and delete the user with a button press, but as soon as they've made a certain number of posts that option goes away. So the forum is really bad software tbh. Without @Chris Kelleher 's level of access I doubt there's much I can do without lots and lots of clicks.
 
Check new profile posts and the members... and pfff what a spambot mess, maybe its time to close progresstalk.com down?

You really need some moderation tools, first seen and last seen within a week -> delete. I think you will be left with less than 1% of the current "members".
 
Check new profile posts and the members... and pfff what a spambot mess, maybe its time to close progresstalk.com down?

You really need some moderation tools, first seen and last seen within a week -> delete. I think you will be left with less than 1% of the current "members".
I've been on at Chris for a while (years) to say I need more access as ultimately he's not keeping this place alive other than when there's hosting issues.
 
maybe its time to close progresstalk.com down
I would hate to see that. Yes, the site could do with some more hands-on administration. But occasional spam aside, historically this site has had a very good signal-to-noise ratio. There is a lot of valuable content in all the posts of the regulars. It would be a shame to see that body of work disappear into the ether.
 
I would hate to see that. Yes, the site could do with some more hands-on administration. But occasional spam aside, historically this site has had a very good signal-to-noise ratio. There is a lot of valuable content in all the posts of the regulars. It would be a shame to see that body of work disappear into the ether.

Luckily the spam hits the posts not too often, but hurray, let's welcome hotty new member Eisha - this new member spam stream is constant. This site has 15 thousand members. I doubt that even 5% is real.
 
Don't forget that there are undoubtedly a very large number of read-only members, not to mention no-longer-working-with-Progress, and other reasons to no longer come here ... including deceased.
 
Don't forget that there are undoubtedly a very large number of read-only members, not to mention no-longer-working-with-Progress, and other reasons to no longer come here ... including deceased.
Sure, but very large related to 15 thousand members? Doubtful.

The spam (sleeper) accounts are easily identified by various criteria:

- join date = last visit date
- join date and last visit date are at most a month apart
- zero posts
- member profiles with hyperlinks containing escort or keto or various other terms
 
Today a spambot that had been dormant for TEN years was activated and posted a first spam post. Grabbing some popcorn to see what exciting offers will be presented this weekend.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top