Sorry about all the spam. For some reason I can't Spam clean it as usual so it would need every thread deleting by hand and the users would still be free to keep posting. @Chris Kelleher are you able to ban and clean the users more easily?
Good call Patrice! That helps a lot until the posts themselves are deleted.You could try to ignore them
I can clean up each post but they're appearing as fast as I clean them up, and it's not the most user friendly interface either. Lots of clicks.Same issue about cleaning up?
Are there moderation tools for approving new users / first posts?I can clean up each post but they're appearing as fast as I clean them up, and it's not the most user friendly interface either. Lots of clicks.
Some seem to go into the approval queue, some don't. I've no idea what governs that. When a user is new, I can spam clean all their threads and delete the user with a button press, but as soon as they've made a certain number of posts that option goes away. So the forum is really bad software tbh. Without @Chris Kelleher 's level of access I doubt there's much I can do without lots and lots of clicks.Are there moderation tools for approving new users / first posts?
I've been on at Chris for a while (years) to say I need more access as ultimately he's not keeping this place alive other than when there's hosting issues.Check new profile posts and the members... and pfff what a spambot mess, maybe its time to close progresstalk.com down?
You really need some moderation tools, first seen and last seen within a week -> delete. I think you will be left with less than 1% of the current "members".
I would hate to see that. Yes, the site could do with some more hands-on administration. But occasional spam aside, historically this site has had a very good signal-to-noise ratio. There is a lot of valuable content in all the posts of the regulars. It would be a shame to see that body of work disappear into the ether.maybe its time to close progresstalk.com down
I would hate to see that. Yes, the site could do with some more hands-on administration. But occasional spam aside, historically this site has had a very good signal-to-noise ratio. There is a lot of valuable content in all the posts of the regulars. It would be a shame to see that body of work disappear into the ether.
Sure, but very large related to 15 thousand members? Doubtful.Don't forget that there are undoubtedly a very large number of read-only members, not to mention no-longer-working-with-Progress, and other reasons to no longer come here ... including deceased.