OpenEdge OECC 2.0 problems

DarkJoney

DarkJoney

New Member
Dear all,

Sorry for the wrong forum, just in case.

Does anyone have a bad experience with the OECC 2.0 running over OE 12.2 Win Server?

We have experienced a very crazy behaviour that disrupts the whole server running PASOE instances - OECC agent and its Java process are starting to eat out all the resources of the server. CPU is peaking to 100%, and the problem is not being solved by just switching off the OECC service. It's Java is keeping running in the background. We had to reboot the hosts and clean all the references to OECC configs and OTEL installation; only then did PASOE's performance get back to normal. OECC logs are full of Java startup almost every few times per minute and failures of connection to something. I can provide details later.

We didn't notice it immediately, since our hosts are quite powerful. It is running fine after the startup, but suddenly, after some time, it keeps growing, leading to the issue. We really wanted to have 2.0 in the service already, since it should resolve a subset of the issues that didn't let us use the OECC with PAS before.

Also, does anyone know if OECC 1.x or 2.x requires any adjustment of the PASOE connection pools? I wonder if it opens any additional ABL sessions or if it keeps fetching the data from the PAS's Java and Catalina.

Thank you, everyone!
Regards,
 
OECC monitors PASOE and databases, and we don't have a PASOE forum, so this thread may as well live here for now. ;)

I haven't used OECC 2.0 yet. It is on my list to get to when I have a chance.

Please keep us updated on what you learn with this issue!
 
I also don't know OECC so I can't be of assistance. You may find reaching out to support or posting on community.progress.com yields better answers as PSC employees sometimes post there.
 
I'd try disabling the OYel functionality in PASOE first, since that's another moving part.

You could also post an example of the messages you're zeeing in the OECC logs here.
 
@peterjudge , we did it as well, but the problem is we do need an OTEL part because we are sending the data to our observability platform; this is the main idea. Or do I miss out something here? Do you suspect an overlap somewhere?

We don't even have the Command Server installed, because a colleague mentioned OECC works correctly without it. Can you please tell me, is it actually true or not?

I have been in contact with Progress, they asked us to try with another Java version, and that they will adjust the documentation based on our feedback. That's it for now.

Other Java versions didn't work as well - we are still getting the same pattern.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top